What is annexation?

The City of Ukiah is trying to expand their city limits — again.

What is Annexation?

Annexation is the means by which an existing city extends its boundaries.

How Does Annexation Work?

Annexation in California is governed by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, which gives each county’s Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) authority over city and district boundary changes. The process typically begins with a city resolution or landowner petition, followed by LAFCO review, environmental assessment, and public hearings. LAFCO evaluates whether the proposal aligns with local spheres of influence and promotes orderly growth. Depending on the level of protest, annexations may proceed, go to a vote, or be terminated.

What is LAFCo?

The LAFCo was established by state law in 1963 to assist local agencies in managing changes to jurisdictional boundaries. Every county in California, totaling 58, has its own LAFCo Commission. The main objectives of LAFCo are to:

  • Encourage the orderly formation of local government agencies and promote the efficient provision of public services

  • Preserve agricultural land and open-space resources

  • Promote orderly growth and discourage urban sprawl

Where is the City Expanding?

The City is looking at possibly annexing areas stretching from Carousel Lane, north of Ukiah, all the way to Highway 253 to the south. Development in this area includes some commercial, industrial, and manufacturing uses (both existing and decommissioned), as well as areas containing vacant and agricultural lands.

Why does this matter?

Annexation matters because it directly changes who provides key services, how tax dollars are used, and how the community grows. Under the proposal, annexed areas would shift to city-managed services like police protection, street maintenance, and code enforcement, while continuing with existing water and sewer systems. Property tax would be redirected toward the City of Ukiah. The City also points to potential improvements in emergency preparedness, response, and recovery planning, along with taking over responsibility for roads and future infrastructure upgrades in annexed neighborhoods. Ultimately, this matters for all residents because the City is seeking to expand its boundaries in a way that would increase its tax base and revenue, shaping how resources are allocated and how the area develops moving forward.

Potential Impacts of the Proposed Ukiah Annexation

County Financial Impacts

County staff estimates the proposed annexation could redirect or reduce approximately $30.4 million in County revenue over time.

That includes:

  • $27.3 million in reduced local sales tax revenue.

  • $3.1 million in lost hotel (Transient Occupancy Tax) revenue.

  • Additional reductions in future property tax growth.

Under the proposed Master Tax Sharing Agreement, the County's share of local sales tax generated in the annexed area would decrease by approximately 6.7% each year. After 15 years, the County would receive none of that local sales tax. The County would initially retain hotel tax revenue generated in the annexed area, but its share would decline each year until reaching 0% after five years.

Although revenue would decline, County staff concluded many major expenses would remain largely unchanged.

These include:

  • Sheriff's Office operations

  • County Jail

  • Coroner services

  • Health and Human Services

  • Mutual aid responsibilities

  • Countywide road maintenance

This means the County could lose revenue while continuing to provide many of the same services.

City Finances

According to the City's financial reports:

  • The General Fund balance declined by approximately $572,000.

  • Revenue growth has slowed due to weaker tax and intergovernmental revenues.

  • The City's unrestricted net position has declined to approximately: -$40.6 million. This reflects significant long-term financial obligations that exceed unrestricted assets.

Current City funding measures are already under pressure. Expanding City boundaries could increase future service and infrastructure obligations.

  • Measure P revenues struggling to keep pace with public safety costs.

  • Measure Y operating with approximately a $2.25 million street maintenance deficit.

Fire Department

Before the Merger

  • 3 fire engines

  • 6 career firefighters

  • 2 chiefs

  • Approximately 50 volunteers

  • Ambulance staffed by suppression-trained firefighters when available

Today

  • 2 fire engines

  • 4 career firefighters

  • 1 chief

  • Approximately 10 volunteers

  • Ambulance staff are no longer required to be suppression-trained

Local officials have acknowledged that funding supporting the Ukiah Valley Fire Authority is scheduled to expire in 2030. Officials have stated that future tax measures may be necessary to maintain fire services. Residents could therefore face additional tax requests in the coming years.

Water Rate Increases

The Ukiah Valley Water Authority has approved substantial water rate increases through 2029. Millview, Willow, and Redwood Valley Water Districts all saw a 64%+ increase over 5 years, the City of Ukiah saw an 18% increase, and Calpella saw a 36%+ increase.

Why People Are Opposing Annexation

  • “Mendocino County Farm Bureau is opposed to the City of Ukiah’s Annexation plan. We have serious reservations regarding the scope and scale of the annexation plan and deep concern regarding the negative fiscal implications this would have for County finances. Such a rapid expansion of the City of Ukiah would endanger farmland through urban sprawl that would lead to an increase in conflicts between agricultural producers conducting everyday farming activities and neighboring urban residents.”

    - Mendocino County Farm Bureau

  • “This annexation as currently proposed will be a lose-lose for everyone and will have a negative impact on all of Mendocino County due to the reduction in revenues from businesses as well as a reduction in services for those annexed into the city. It became clear that this annexation will likely have serious implications for the county. Based on this map I also have concerns the city may be picking locations of revenue and cutting out locations which could be an expense.”

    - Matt Kendall, Mendocino County Sheriff

  • “The City of Ukiah didn’t ask us if we wanted to be part of Ukiah — they’re telling us. They could have put an advisory measure on the ballot, but they didn’t get any public input. They think they can just tell us we have to go along with their program. They held ‘workshops’ not to listen to our concerns, but to tell us how it’s going to be. If I wanted to live and run my business in the City, I would live in the City, and my business would be in the City — but I’m not.”

    - Ross Liberty, President of Factory Pipe

  • “This plan reflects a clear disregard for the property rights and lifestyle choices of residents who intentionally live outside city boundaries to preserve an agricultural or rural way of life. These citizens are now facing the imposition of city oversight without consent, due process, or adequate representation. More concerning is the imposition of city-level regulations that would severely restrict or prohibit long-standing rural practices which are integral to rural living and agricultural operations.”

    - Mendocino County Employers Council

  • “I believe annexation at this scale is premature and should only move forward once the city proves it can deliver superior services and demonstrate financial stability. Smart, sustainable growth takes time and transparency. As a business owner, I’ve asked how this change will benefit us, but I’ve yet to receive a clear answer. Right now, I can point to specific ways this will increase costs for both my business and my customers—without a single clear benefit in return.”

    John Strangio, Owner of the Ukiah Valley Athletic Authority

  • “The city has already shown that they cannot fill their police roster, even with a hiring bonus of $25,000 and now they want to increase the geographic requirements by three times and the population coverage by 60%. That, to me, is a non starter. On top of that they have been pretty clear about their desire to impose new requirements on residential development making it more difficult and expensive. I for one would like my children to have the opportunity to live in Ukiah. If this annexation proposal takes place it will reduce that possibility.”

    - Richard Selzer

  • “The City of Ukiah, through its application for annexation of a massive area, proposes to encompass operating lumber mills, wineries, mom-and-pop repair shops and grocery stores, and numerous other commercial businesses. The City of Ukiah absolutely does not have the scope of knowledge, the manpower, or resources to oversee, regulate and protect these types of important enterprises. People cannot sit idly by and allow the City to expand its boundaries to impose its over-reaching governance, and all the negatives that come with it, into the proposed annexation area.”

    - Martha Barra, Barra of Mendocino

Community Members Opposing Annexation

Gerardo Alvarez

Catherine Andres

Sergio Arreguin

Gilbert Ashoff

Daniel Baldi

Anita Bakker

Lenny Banks

Martha Barra

Katrina Bartolomie

Connor Bazzani

Robert Bazzani

Scott Bazzani

Charlene Beighle

Stacie Bennett

Anne Berndt

Matthew Blake

Alex Bland

Cherie Blower

Jeff Bode

Ron Bostwick

Kyle Brooks

John Buchanan

Kenneth Budrow

Charlotte Burns

Emily Burrell

Shirley Bush

Bret Byrd

Kevin Caro

Chelsea Carrera

Juan Novoa Ceja

Dustin Chernoh

Karry Crawford

Tom Crowfoot

Kippi Cummins

Fawnell Dale

Bonnie Dashiell

Nina Davis

Julie Dickson

Patricia Dohn

Lindy Dunaway

Marc Engstrom

Steve Enzler

Saya Erica

Matthew Finnegan

Ryan Ford

Nicole Fraser

Ed Gall

Adam Gaska

Kathleen Gilley

Rick Gilmore

Julie Golden

Jenn Gray

Kathryn Testa Grieve

Amy Henry

Connie Hickerson

Richard Higinbotham

Tom Hine

James Holmes

Lee Howard

Kelly Huffman

Kim Huffman

Karen Jason

Sheila Jenkins

Stephen Johnson

Jenni Karakasevic

Benjamin Kater

Chris Kocher

Kimberly LaRue

Anne Lattimore

John Lattimore

Carina Lavin

John Lazaro

Nancy Lee

Craig Lehman

Nicole Leong

Melanie LoGrande

Robert Long

Christina Lopez

Fred Loupy

Jason Lucas

Maureen Luis

Todd Lyly

Jake Maeyama

Melissa Martella

Wilbert Martin

Penny Mathis

Sally McKnight

Blake Medellin

Yazmin Mendoza

Sergio Meza

Steve Miller

David Minsinger

Robert Mothershed

Aaron Niderost

Marco Ochoa

Louise Onori

Philip Onori

Jennifer Palmer

Bill Pauli

Frost Pauli

Jared Paz

Oliver Perry

Jonathan Peterson

Jim Pool

Jordan Pool

Ian Powell

John Ragland

Janelle Rau

David Redding

Ginny Richards

Lynette Addor Riley

Steve Roberts

Isidro Rodriguez Jr

Jim Ronco

Janet Rosen

Neda Rowlison

Amanda Sears

Ken Seckora

Dick Selzer

Carrie Shattuck

Beverley Sherman

Nancy Skelly

Bruce Smith

John Snyder

Austin Steinmann

Kylle StPierre

Aihlya Sutton

Wil Sutton

Kay Testa

Kayla Theison

Dennis Thibeault

Norman Thurston

Salina Tollini

Antonio Toste

Tony Toste

Vicki Turner

Kerri Vau

Travis Vonfeldt

Richard Wagner

Donna Walker

Scott Walker

Tim Weaver

Anita Wells

Dawn White

James Wilson

Ron Wilson

Leonard Winter

Bradley Wright

Tracy Wright-Williams

Only a partial list